facebook
twitter
eISSN: 1734-4948
ISSN: 0860-6161
Advances in Rehabilitation
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
 
4/2022
vol. 36
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Original article

Equilibrium coordination tests among children: A feasibility study

Nidhi Sharma
1
,
Asir John Samuel
1

1.
Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, India
Advances in Rehabilitation, 2022, 36(4), 1–7
Online publish date: 2022/11/16
Article file
- 2022-04-ar-01.pdf  [0.56 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Bolk J, Farooqi A, Hafström M, Aden U, Serenius F. Developmental coordination disorder and its association with developmental comorbidities at 6.5 years in apparently healthy children born extremely preterm. JAMA Pediatr. 2018; 172(8): 765-74.
2. Lajoie Y, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M. Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Exp Brain Res. 1993; 97(1): 139-44.
3. Stefanie Schmidt YP. Normative Data. Encycl. Qual. Life Well-Being Res. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2014.
4. Barbara AS, Raul M, Cyhan T, Roberts H GN. normative values for the unipedal stance test with eyes open and closed. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2007; 30(1): 8-15.
5. Dhanani SD, Parmar LD. Normative values of tandem and unipedal stance in school children. Int J Curr Res Rev. 2014; 6: 24-30.
6. Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L. Age – and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: six-minute walk test, berg balance scale, timed up & go test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther. 2002; 82(2): 128-37.
7. Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 36(5): 452-7.
8. Billingham SA, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13: 104.
9. Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Lancaster GA. What is a pilot or feasibility study ? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10(67): 1471-2288.
10. Omar K, Samuel AJ. Normative reference value for tactile localization acuity among school-going children: A normative research. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2020; 15(3): 199-203.
11. ICMR. National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants. Indian council of medical research [Internet]. 2017 Oct[cited 2021 Aug 24]; [about 23-24 p]. Available from: https://thsti.res.in/pdf/National_Ethical_Guidelines_for_BioMedical_Research_Involving_Children. pdf
12. Cranage S, Perraton L, Bowles KA, Williams C. The impact of shoe flexibility on gait, pressure and muscle activity of young children. A systematic review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2019; 12: 55.
13. Reilly DS, Woollacott MH, van Donkelaar P, Saavedra S. The interaction between executive attention and postural control in dual-task conditions: children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89(5): 834-42.
14. Tyson S, Connell L. The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2009; 23(11): 1018-33.
15. Shirota C, Jansa J, Diaz J, Balasubramanian S, Mazzoleni S, Borghese NA, et al. On the assessment of coordination between upper extremities: Towards a common language between rehabilitation engineers, clinicians and neuroscientists. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016; 13(1): 80.
16. Ridao-Fernández C, Pinero-Pinto E, Chamorro-Moriana G. Observational gait assessment scales in patients Advances in Rehabilitation, 2022, 36(4), 1–7 7 with walking disorders: systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2085039.
17. Pinheiro M de B, Menezes KKP de, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Review of the psychometric properties of lower limb motor coordination tests. Fisioter em Mov. 2014; 27(4): 541-53.
18. Ashford S, Slade M, Malaprade F, Turner-Stokes L. Evaluation of functional outcome measures for the hemiparetic upper limb: A systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2008; 40(10): 787-95.
19. Bohannon RW, Wang YC, Bubela D, Gershon RC. Normative two-minute walk test distances for boys and girls 3 to 17 years of age. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2018; 38(1): 39-45.
20. Geldhof E, Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. Static and dynamic standing balance: test-retest reliability and reference values in 9 to 10 year old children. Eur J Pediatr. 2006; 165(11): 779-86.
21. Libardoni TC, Silveira CBD, Sinhorim LMB, Oliveira AS, Santos MJD, Santos GM. Reference values and equations reference of balance for children of 8 to 12 years. Gait Posture. 2018; 60: 122-7.
22. Ting LH, Chvatal SA, Safavynia SA, McKay JL. Review and perspective: neuromechanical considerations for predicting muscle activation patterns for movement. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2012; 28(10): 1003-14.
23. Panchal A, Tedla JS, Ghatamaneni D, Reddy RS, Sangadala DR, Alshahrani MS. Normative reference values for the timed up-and-go test in Indian children aged four to 11 years old and their correlation with demographic characteristics: A cross-sectional study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021; 24(4): 569-75.
24. Sles RC, Choy NL, Steer M, Nitz JC. Normal values of balance tests in women aged 20-80. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004; 52(8): 1367-72.
25. Chetta A, Zanini A, Pisi G, et al. Reference values for the 6-min walk test in healthy subjects 20-50 years old. Respir Med. 2006; 100(9): 1573-8.
26. Bohannon RW, Wang YC, Gershon RC. Two-minute walk test performance by adults 18 to 85 years: normative values, reliability, and responsiveness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96(3): 472-7.
27. Lanzino DJ, Conner MN, Goodman KA, Kremer KH, Petkus MT, Hollman JH. Values for timed limb coordination tests in a sample of healthy older adults. Age Ageing. 2012; 41(6): 803-7.
28. Casanova C, Celli BR, Barria P, et al. The 6-min walk distance in healthy subjects: reference standards from seven countries. Eur Respir J. 2011; 37(1): 150-6.
29. Long J, Cai T, Huang X, Zhou Y, Kuang J, Wu L. Reference value for the TUGT in healthy older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatr Nurs. 2020; 41(3): 325-30.
30. Goemans N, Klingels K, Van Den Hauwe M, Boons S, Verstraete L, Peeters C, et al. Six-minute walk test: Reference values and prediction equation in healthy boys aged 5 to12 years. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12): e84120.
31. Özcan Kahraman B, Yüksel E, Nalbant A, Koçak UZ, Ünver B. Reference values and prediction equation for the 6-minute walk test in healthy children aged 6–12 years old. Turkish J Med Sci. 2019; 49(4): 1126-31.
32. Baptista CRJA De, Vicente AM, Souza MA, Cardoso J, Ramalho VM, Mattiello-sverzut AC. Methods of 10-Meter Walk Test and Repercussions for Reliability Obtained in Typically Developing Children. Rehabil Res Pract. 2020: 4209812.
33. Tolea MI, Costa PT, Terracciano A, et al. Sex-specific correlates of walking speed in a wide age-ranged population. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010; 65B(2): 174-84
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.










Quick links
© 2023 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.